Learn QI methodology to systematically improve patient care and services
QI is a systematic approach to making changes that lead to better patient outcomes, more efficient systems, and improved staff experience. It uses data and structured methods to test and implement improvements.
QI is different from:
Three fundamental questions guide every QI project:
Define your aim. Be specific: "Reduce discharge delays by 30% in 6 months"
Choose measures. Track data over time using run charts or SPC charts
Generate ideas, then test using PDSA cycles
PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) is the core QI methodology. You test changes on a small scale before rolling out widely.
Example: Test same-day discharge letters for 5 patients next week. Predict: letters will go out within 24 hours instead of 7 days.
Example: Clinician dictates letters immediately after ward round. Secretary types same day. Record actual turnaround times.
Example: 4 out of 5 letters sent within 24 hours. One delayed because clinician was on call. Learning: need cover system.
Example: Adapt the process to include cover arrangements. Run another PDSA with 10 patients. If successful, roll out to whole ward.
Key principle: Start small, learn fast, scale gradually
Multiple rapid PDSA cycles are better than one big implementation
Visual diagram showing every step in a process. Helps identify waste, delays, and improvement opportunities.
When to use: Understanding current state before making changes
Shows the relationship between your aim, primary drivers (major factors), and change ideas.
When to use: Planning which changes will achieve your aim
Plot data over time to see if changes lead to improvement. Look for trends, shifts, and patterns.
When to use: Monitoring whether your changes are working
Identifies potential causes of a problem across categories: People, Process, Equipment, Environment, etc.
When to use: Root cause analysis
80/20 rule - identifies which few factors cause most of the problem.
When to use: Prioritising which issues to tackle first
PDSA testing of enhanced cleaning protocols, hand hygiene campaigns, and environmental swabs. 40% reduction in C.diff in 6 months.
Process mapping revealed multiple handover points. Tested electronic prescribing in one ward. Errors reduced by 60%, rolled out trust-wide.
Rapid assessment at front door, streaming patients by acuity, discharge lounge for awaiting transport. 4-hour target improved from 82% to 94%.